Benchmarks.
Reproducible performance tests comparing LiteSpeed with nginx, Apache and Varnish across applications, protocols and security setups.
WordPress · HTTP/2 comparison
Choose a metric to compare the results.
All Benchmarks
ESI Benchmark
We compared the speed at which different web servers and caching platforms respond to requests for small ESI scripts using both non-keep-alive and kee…
Learn more HTTP/2HTTP/2 Implementation: LiteSpeed vs Nginx
LiteSpeed Web Server is 4X FASTER than Nginx
Learn more JoomlaJoomla Benchmarks
We took a demo Joomla site and loaded up its main page (around 378KB) to test our HTTP/2 implementation against that of nginx and Apache. LiteSpeed We…
Learn more MagentoLiteMage 1.3 Delivers Ultimate Magento Performance
There is a wealth of statistics ( 1, 2 ) pointing out the extreme impatience of online shoppers (conversion rates dropping 7% due to 1 second page loa…
Learn more DrupalDrupal HTTP/2 Benchmarks
We put LiteSpeed Web Server with our LiteSpeed Cache module for Drupal to the test. Compared to nginx with Varnish and Apache with Varnish, LiteSpeed …
Learn more Drupal 9LiteSpeed Drupal Is Faster Than Nginx For Drupal 9
We compared LiteSpeed Web Server + LSCache for Drupal, OpenLiteSpeed + LSCache for Drupal, and nginx + FastCGI. LiteSpeed Web Server, when paired with…
Learn more Magento 2Magento 2 HTTP/2 Benchmarks
We took LiteSpeed Web Server, nginx, and Apache, paired them with caching solutions, and tested how their HTTP/2 implementations compared when loading…
Learn more OpenCartOpenCart HTTP/2 Benchmarks
We tested LiteSpeed Web Server and LiteSpeed Cache extension on a demo OpenCart site, and it outperformed other HTTP/2 servers by a dramatic margin: m…
Learn more PHP · HTTP/2PHP HTTP/2 Benchmarks Hello World
This benchmark compares the speed at which different web servers respond to requests for small PHP scripts. We used a tiny script to avoid saturating …
Learn more PrestaShopPrestashop Performance Benchmarks
Most of the time, a PrestaShop full page cache plugin will cost you somewhere around $120 to $180 USD, but LiteSpeed's cache extension is FREE to Pres…
Learn more Static · HTTP/2Small Static File HTTP/2 Benchmarks
We compared web server response times when requesting small static files. Comparing small files is a standard practice for benchmarking, as this allow…
Learn more ModSecurityModSecurity Performance in Apache nginx LiteSpeed
We wanted to know how ModSecurity impacts server performance, so we tested ModSecurity implementations on HTTP/2 from LiteSpeed, nginx, and Apache, to…
Learn more PHPPHP Hello World Benchmark
Comparing web server response time to requests for small PHP scripts
Learn more Static filesSmall Static File Benchmark
Comparing web server response time to requests for small static files
Learn more vs VarnishVarnish Comparison Benchmark
We compared the speed at which Varnish and LSCache deliver cached content. We ran tests with small dynamic and static files, and tested with and witho…
Learn more WordPressWordPress Benchmarks
HTTP/2 and HTTP/1.1 implementations of LiteSpeed Web Server, nginx and Apache compared while loading a cached WordPress page — each server paired with…
Learn more Static · HTTPSSmall Static File Benchmark
Comparing web server response time to requests for small static files
Learn more Static filesSmall Static File Benchmark
Comparing web server response time to requests for small static files
Learn moreSwitch to LiteSpeed
in minutes.
Choose your edition, activate over SSH, and start serving faster. Transparent pricing, no setup fees, engineers on call 24/7.