Serving Static Content - hello.html
LSCache typically outperforms Varnish by a factor of 2.
We compared the speed at which Varnish and LSCache deliver cached content. We ran tests with small dynamic and static files, and tested with and without keep-alive.
LSCache typically outperforms Varnish by a factor of 2.
Choose a metric to compare the results.
| Concurrent users | Keep-alive | vs Apache / Varnish |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | No | 2.3x |
| 10 | Yes | 2.1x |
| 100 | No | 1.8x |
| 100 | Yes | 1.6x |
Choose a metric to compare the results.
| Concurrent users | Keep-alive | vs Apache / Varnish |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | No | 2.6x |
| 10 | Yes | 3.0x |
| 100 | No | 1.8x |
| 100 | Yes | 2.2x |
Figures as published by LiteSpeed Technologies. Results depend on hardware, configuration and workload — test with your own application for the most relevant numbers.
Choose your edition, activate over SSH, and start serving faster. Transparent pricing, no setup fees, engineers on call 24/7.